Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to make coverage decisions: a methodological framework

نویسندگان

  • Panos Kanavos
  • Aris Angelis
چکیده

Results We propose a methodological process comprising five distinct phases (problem structuring, model building, model assessment, model appraisal and development of action plans), outline the stages involved in each phase and discuss their relevance in the HTA process. Additionally, criteria and attributes need to satisfy a set of desired properties, otherwise the process of preference elicitation can produce spurious results. The resulting MCDA output, which can take the form of a single universal value index, can be informed by stakeholder participation and therefore can be robust and reflective of stakeholder preferences.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Modelling the Level of Adoption of Analytical Tools; An Implementation of Multi-Criteria Evidential Reasoning

In the future, competitive advantages will be given to organisations that can extract valuable information from massive data and make better decisions. In most cases, this data comes from multiple sources. Therefore, the challenge is to aggregate them into a common framework in order to make them meaningful and useful.This paper will first review the most important multi-criteria decision analy...

متن کامل

A Review and Classification of Approaches for Dealing with Uncertainty in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Healthcare Decisions

Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is increasingly used to support decisions in healthcare involving multiple and conflicting criteria. Although uncertainty is usually carefully addressed in health economic evaluations, whether and how the different sources of uncertainty are dealt with and with what methods in MCDA is less known. The objective of this study is to review how uncertainty ca...

متن کامل

Applying Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis to Comparative Benefit-Risk Assessment: Choosing among Statins in Primary Prevention.

Decision makers in different health care settings need to weigh the benefits and harms of alternative treatment strategies. Such health care decisions include marketing authorization by regulatory agencies, practice guideline formulation by clinical groups, and treatment selection by prescribers and patients in clinical practice. Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a family of formal ...

متن کامل

New Modelling Paradigms in Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Sustainable Forest Management

The broad range of applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to forest management has demonstrated its potential as an interdisciplinary methodological framework for decision-making. However, traditional MCDA methods have also shown to have some limitations in addressing the inherent complexity of forest resources management and planning problems. This is particularly true in sust...

متن کامل

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Value Based Assessment of New Medical Technologies: A Conceptual Framework

Acknowledgements This is a paper written under the auspices of ADVANCE_HTA, a research project funded by the European Commission's Framework Programme 7 for Research. The paper does not express the views of the European Commission. Abstract Assessing the value of new medical technologies may require new approaches that take into account a more comprehensive set of parameters than the incrementa...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 8  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015